Celestia's Bold Proposal: Ditching Staking or a $100M Team Cash-Out?

by:ZenChainX2 days ago
457
Celestia's Bold Proposal: Ditching Staking or a $100M Team Cash-Out?

The Stake That Broke the Camel’s Back

When Celestia co-founder John Adler proposed replacing Proof-of-Stake (PoS) with “Proof-of-Governance” (PoG), the crypto community did a double-take. As someone who’s written smart contracts since Solidity v0.4.0, even I had to re-read the whitepaper twice. The proposal suggests:

  • 95% reduction in TIA issuance
  • Complete elimination of staking contracts
  • Transition to off-chain validator selection

On paper? A bold rethinking of blockchain economics. In practice? The timing smells worse than a Ponzi scheme’s balance sheet.

Follow the Money Trail

Blockchain doesn’t lie. While Adler pitched PoG as an anti-inflation measure, on-chain data reveals core team members dumped $109M worth of TIA post-unlock. That includes:

  • 2.6M TIA sold by address celestia1erglsz… ($27.3M)
  • OTC transactions totaling $25M+ linked to co-founder Mustafa

“I never sold a single TIA,” claimed COO Nick White. Cute statement - pity the blockchain ledger disagrees.

DAO or Die Trying?

The technical merits deserve analysis. Adler argues current PoS is essentially “Proof-of-Authority with extra steps,” proposing instead:

  1. Validators paid via transaction fees (no new issuance)
  2. Governance through off-chain committees
  3. Daily \(100-\)300 fee burns

It’s an elegant model… if implemented by teams that haven’t already liquidated their bags. My valuation models show TIA trading at 70x its actual protocol revenue - suggesting this “innovation” might just be rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.

The Bankless Connection

Interesting how certain influencers like Bankless’ David became sudden Celestia cheerleaders despite:

  • Zero hands-on experience with Celestia’s tech
  • Contradictory statements about personal TIA holdings

Meanwhile, leaked docs suggest seven-figure payments to media outlets for “positive coverage.” In crypto, we call this “marketing.” The SEC calls it… well, you know.

Survival Mode Activated

Celestia claims $100M runway and compares TIA’s 92% drop to “industry norms.” Having survived three crypto winters, I’ll concede their point - most alts bleed out. But few combine:

  1. Radical protocol changes
  2. Massive insider selling
  3. Paid influencer campaigns

all while their “modular blockchain” narrative gathers dust.

The coming months will reveal whether PoG represents genuine innovation or simply Proof-of-Grift. Either way, I’m keeping my popcorn - and cold wallet - ready.

ZenChainX

Likes81.02K Fans957

Hot comment (2)

13 hours ago

¿Prueba de Gobernanza o Prueba de Desastre?

Celestia propone cambiar el PoS por ‘Prueba de Gobernanza’, pero con los fundadores vendiendo $100M en TIA, huele más a ‘Prueba de Salida Rápida’.

Dinero Habla, Blockchain No Miente

El COO dice ‘nunca vendí TIA’, pero el ledger muestra lo contrario. ¡Hasta mi abuela con su Nokia 1100 lo ve venir!

Popcorn Listo

Si esto es innovación, prefiero quedarme con Bitcoin. ¿Ustedes qué opinan? ¡Comenten abajo!

164
16
0
TexChain
TexChainTexChain
1 day ago

When ‘Innovation’ Smells Like Exit Liquidity

Celestia’s switch from PoS to “Proof-of-Governance” would be groundbreaking… if it didn’t coincide perfectly with a $109M team cash-out. As a blockchain analyst, I’ve seen creative tokenomics before - but timing proposal announcements right after unlocking periods? That’s not PoG, that’s Proof-of-Grift.

Blockchain Doesn’t Lie (But Teams Do)

The COO claims “never sold a single TIA” while on-chain data shows millions liquidated. Reminds me of my ex who “wasn’t hungry” but ate my entire pizza. At least my ex didn’t charge me gas fees for the betrayal.

Popcorn-Ready Drama

Between paid influencer campaigns and this “revolutionary” protocol change that conveniently reduces their token holdings’ dilution, Celestia is writing the perfect crypto soap opera. Grab your cold wallets folks - this show’s just getting started!

126
70
0