El Fin del Nano S

O Ledger Nano S morreu de tanta fama? Ele foi o rei da carteira de cripto… e agora tá mais velho que meu avô na festa de Carnaval! Com 320KB de memória em 2016 e ainda segura? Mas se eu colocar um patch… será que ele tá com ENS ou ZK-rollups? A Apple atualiza o iOS; o Ledger só desliga porque “segurança” é sinônimo de obsolescência disfarçada. Quem vai pagar por isso? Eu pago com samba e não com firmware! 😅

¡El Nano S no murió… ¡se jubiló! En 2016 lo compramos como el rey del auto-custody, y ahora nos dicen que es ‘obsoleto’… ¿Pero si su memoria de 320KB aún hace transacciones? ¡Es más fuerte que mi abuela en Semana Santa! Si Apple actualiza su iPhone cada mes… ¿por qué Ledger no puede? Porque no vende seguridad… ¡vende confianza! ¿Quién quiere un wallet que se apague? Yo quiero uno que me recuerde que soy dueño de mis claves… ¡no de mi cuenta bancaria!

So… my Ledger Nano S just died of old age? I thought it was a hardware wallet. Turns out it’s more like a digital coffin with 320KB of trust.

Apple gave me iOS updates for 10 years. Ledger gave me ‘end of life’ as a firmware eulogy.

We didn’t upgrade—we got ghostbusted.

Who else cried when their wallet stopped working? 🫸

(Comment below if you still believe ‘security’ isn’t just obsolescence in disguise.)

Ledger’s Nano S didn’t die—it just outlived its own hype. For £79, you bought a digital reliquary that still handles BTC better than your iPhone’s latest update. Meanwhile, Apple gives you 10 years; Ledger gives you eternal security… through planned obsolescence disguised as “prudence.” Who retires trust infrastructure? Only when ethics finally run out—and then you realize: it was never about safety. It was about monetizing FOMO.

So… who’s really the king here? Drop a comment before I buy my next wallet—or just keep using this one until 2030.